Performance of Clutch Cutter vs. Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Methods among Gastroenterology Trainees in an Ex Vivo Model
Overview
Tab Title Description
Study type
InterventionalDescribes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
- Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
- Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
- Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
Study IDs
Sponsor Protocol Number: 17-000966
About this study
The purpose of this study is to assess for differences between Clutch Cutter vs. conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques with regards to; Time to incision; Time to dissection; Total procedure time; Number of perforations; and Ease of use as determined by participant questionnaire.
Participation eligibility
Participant eligibility includes age, gender, type and stage of disease, and previous treatments or health concerns. Guidelines differ from study to study, and identify who can or cannot participate. There is no guarantee that every individual who qualifies and wants to participate in a trial will be enrolled. Contact the study team to discuss study eligibility and potential participation.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Gastroenterology trainees that have completed a minimum 50 endoscopic procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior experience in performing ESD.
More information
Publications
Publications are currently not available