Filter Results
Clinical Studies
Results filtered:Study status:
Open
Contact Us for the Latest Status
Closed for Enrollment
Open
-
A Phase I/IIa First-in-Human Study of [212Pb]VMT-α-NET Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy for Advanced SSTR2 Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors (212-Pb-VMT)
Rochester, Minn.,
Jacksonville, Fla.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary effectiveness of [ 212Pb]VMT-α-NET, an alpha particle radiation delivering agent targeted to somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2).
-
A021901, Randomized Phase II Trial of Lutetium Lu 177 Dotatate Versus Everolimus in Somatostatin Receptor Positive Bronchial Neuroendocrine Tumors
Rochester, Minn.
The purpose of this trial is to study the effect of lutetium Lu 177 dotatate compared to the usual treatment (everolimus) in treating patients with somatostatin receptor positive bronchial neuroendocrine tumors that have spread to other places in the body (advanced). Radioactive drugs, such as lutetium Lu 177 dotatate, may carry radiation directly to tumor cells and may reduce harm to normal cells. Lutetium Lu 177 dotatate may be more effective than everolimus in shrinking or stabilizing advanced bronchial neuroendocrine tumors.
-
CHIP and Hematological Toxicity After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.,
Rochester, Minn.,
Jacksonville, Fla.
The purpose of this study is to combine robust clinical data (e.g., prior chemotherapy or radiation exposure, cumulative Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT dose)) with genetic and clonal abnormalities (blood-based CHIP panel) in studying the predisposing risk factors for developing hematological toxicity including t-MN in PRRT-treated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients.
-
DP-1111-02CT: A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, Open-label, Multicentre Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) With 177Lu-Edotreotide Compared to Best Standard of Care in Patients With Well-differentiated Aggressive Grade 2 and Grade 3, Somatostatin Receptor-Positive (SSTR+), Neuroendocrine Tumours of GastroEnteric or Pancreatic Origin (COMPOSE)
Rochester, Minn.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and patient-reported outcomes of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-Edotreotide as 1st or 2nd line of treatment compared to best standard of care in patients with well-differentiated aggressive grade 2 and grade 3, somatostatin receptor-positive (SSTR+), neuroendocrine tumours of gastroenteric or pancreatic origin.
-
Neuroendocrine Tumors – Patient Reported Outcomes (NETPRO) (NET-PRO)
Rochester, Minn.
The purpose of this study is to partner with patients on comparative effectiveness research (CER) to achieve the goal of alleviating undue toxicity, and optimizing effectiveness and sequencing of therapy for patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET).
-
Phase 1b/3 Global, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Trial Comparing Treatment With RYZ101 to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Inoperable, Advanced, SSTR+, Well-differentiated GEP-NETs That Have Progressed Following Prior 177Lu-SSA Therapy (ACTION-1)
Jacksonville, Fla.,
Rochester, Minn.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended Phase 3 dose (RP3D) of RYZ101 in Part 1, and the safety, effectiveness, and PK of RYZ101 compared with investigator-selected standard of care (SoC) therapy in Part 2 in subjects with inoperable, advanced, well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor expressing (SSTR+) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) that have progressed following treatment with Lutetium 177-labelled somatostatin analogue (177Lu-SSA) therapy, such as 177Lu-DOTATATE or 177Lu-DOTATOC (177Lu-DOTATATE/TOC), or 177Lu-high affinity [HA]-DOTATATE.
Contact Us for the Latest Status
Closed for Enrollment
-
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, 3-Arm Phase 3 Study of Encorafenib Cetuximab Plus or Minus Binimetinib vs. Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5- Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA) /Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab With a Safety Lead-in of Encorafenib Binimetinib Cetuximab in Patients With BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (BEACON CRC)
Jacksonville, Fla.,
Rochester, Minn.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3-arm Phase 3 study to evaluate encorafenib + cetuximab plus or minus binimetinib versus Investigator's choice of either irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab, as controls, in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. The study contains a Safety Lead-in Phase in which the safety and tolerability of encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab will be assessed prior to the Phase 3 portion of the study.
-
A Phase 1, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study of SNX 5422 and Everolimus in Subjects With Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Rochester, Minn.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
Study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SNX-5422 when given in combination with everolimus.
-
A Phase 1/2a, Multicenter, Open-label Trial of TBio-6517, an Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus, Administered Alone and in Combination with Pembrolizumab, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors (RAPTOR)
Rochester, Minn.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.,
Jacksonville, Fla.
The purpose of this study is to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TBio-6517 when administered by direct injection into tumor(s) alone and when combined with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors (RIVAL-01).
-
A Phase I Trial of Triapine and Lutetium Lu 177 Dotatate in Combination for Well-Differentiated Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) (GEP-NETs)
Rochester, Minn.,
Jacksonville, Fla.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of Lutetium Lu 177 Dotatate in combination with triapine.
-
A Phase II Study of MLN0128 (TAK-228) in Rapalog-Resistant Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNET)
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.,
Rochester, Minn.
This phase II trial studies how well sapanisertib works in treating patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor that has spread to other places in the body, does not respond to treatment, or cannot be surgically removed. Drugs such as sapanisertib may stop the growth or shrink tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth
-
A Phase III, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel/Depot 120 mg Plus BSC versus Placebo Plus BSC for Tumor Control in Subjects with Well Differentiated, Metastatic and/or Unresectable, Typical or Atypical, Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors (SPINET)
Rochester, Minn.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lanreotide acetate analog/ depot plus the best standard care for the treatment of lung neuroendocrine tumors that have spread or can not be surgically removed.
-
A Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Dose Response of Paltusotine Treatment in Subjects With Carcinoid Syndrome
Rochester, Minn.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and exploratory dose response of paltusotine treatment in subjects with carcinoid syndrome. This study consists of a Randomized Treatment Phase followed by an Open-Label Extension (OLE) Phase.
-
AG120-C-005; A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Study of AG-120 in Previously-treated Subjects With Nonresectable or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma With an IDH1 Mutation (ClarIDHy)
Rochester, Minn.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
Study AG120-C-005 is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of orally administered AG-120. Subjects, all personnel involved in the evaluation of subjects' response to treatment (e.g., Investigators, study coordinators, study pharmacists), and designated Sponsor team members will be blinded to study treatment. Subjects are required to have a histologically-confirmed diagnosis of IDH1 gene-mutated cholangiocarcinoma that is not eligible for curative resection, transplantation, or ablative therapies prior to enrollment.IDH1 mutation testing will be performed at participating investigative sites. Subjects must have progression of disease and have received at least 1 but not more than 2 prior treatment regimens for advanced disease (nonresectable or metastatic). All subjects must have received either a gemcitabine or a 5 fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy regimen.
-
BACCI: A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Capecitabine Bevacizumab Plus Atezolizumab Versus Capecitabine Bevacizumab Plus Placebo in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.,
Rochester, Minn.
This randomized phase II trial studies how well atezolizumab and capecitabine with or without bevacizumab work in treating patients with colorectal cancer that is not responding to treatment and has spread to other places. Monoclonal antibodies, such as atezolizumab and bevacizumab, may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving atezolizumab with capecitabine and bevacizumab may be a better way in treating colorectal cancer.
-
BAY 1895344 Plus Topoisomerase-1 (Top1) Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors, Phase I Studies with Expansion Cohorts in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (SCLC), Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (PD-NEC) and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PDA), 10402 (BAY 1895344)
Rochester, Minn.,
Jacksonville, Fla.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
The purpose of this study is to test the safety and tolerability of a drug called BAY 1895344 in combination with irinotecan or topotecan at different doses.
Irinotecan has already been approved by the FDA to treat pancreatic cancer while topotecan has already been approved by the FDA to treat small cell lung cancer.
Another purpose of the study is to check the level of the study drugs in your blood called pharmacokinetics or PK and to see if there are changes in levels of circulating tumor cells in your blood. To assess what effect the study drugs have on damaging the DNA of your cancer, pharmacodynamic or PD studies will be performed from the on-treatment tumor biopsies for patients in the expansion group. In addition, another objective of the study is for future biobanking studies related to your tumor and blood samples such as a biomarker study.
-
CAAA601A22301: A Phase III Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lutathera in Patients With Grade 2 and Grade 3 Advanced GEP-NET (NETTER-2)
Rochester, Minn.
The purpose of this study is to determine if Lutathera in combination with long-acting octreotide prolongs PFS in GEP-NET patients with high proliferation rate tumors (G2 and G3), when given as a first line treatment compared to treatment with high dose (60 mg) long-acting octreotide. Somatostatin analog (SSA) naive patients are eligible, as well as patients previously treated with SSAs in the absence of progression.
-
Care processes promoting person-centred care according to patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs)
Rochester, Minn.
Given that neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a rare condition with complex treatment decisions and a lack of concrete guidance for physicians, shared-decision making (SDM) is particularly challenging.In an effort to improve PCC, we hope to identify care processes throughout the clinical encounter that are important to patients. Identifying these processes would allow for standardization of the care environment without focusing on specific provider characteristics. As such, changes to the institutional and system-level processes could be made in more actionable and systematic ways.
-
Chromogranin A as Surveillance Biomarker in Patients with cARcinoids - The CASPAR Study (MVSS study BRM005-17 CgA)
Rochester, Minn.
The purpose of this study is to monitor and validate the performance and stability of the BRAHMS Chromogranin A (CgA) II KRYPTOR Assay in patients with Gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).
-
DZB-CS-301, A pivotal study of derazantinib in patients with inoperable or advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and FGFR2 gene fusions or FGFR2 gene mutations or amplifications
Rochester, Minn.,
Jacksonville, Fla.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
This pivotal, open-label, single-arm study will evaluate the anti-cancer activity of ARQ 087 by Objective Response Rate (ORR) by central radiology review as per RECIST v1.1 in subjects with inoperable or advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) whose tumors harbor FGFR2 gene fusions (by FISH performed by the central laboratory) and who received at least one prior regimen of systemic therapy. Subjects will be dosed orally once per day at 300 mg of ARQ 087 capsules.
-
EA2142, Randomized Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Etoposide Versus Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced G3 Non-small Cell Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas
Rochester, Minn.
This randomized phase II trial studies how well temozolomide and capecitabine work compared to standard treatment with cisplatin and etoposide in treating patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract or pancreas that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) or cannot be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, capecitabine, cisplatin, and etoposide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Certain types of neuroendocrine carcinomas may respond better to treatments other than the current standard treatment of cisplatin and etoposide. It is not yet known whether temozolomide and capecitabine may work better than cisplatin and etoposide in treating patients with this type of neuroendocrine carcinoma, called non-small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.
-
HS-19-657, A Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label, Active-controlled Phase 3 Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot (CAM2029) Versus Octreotide LAR or Lanreotide ATG in Patients With GEP-NET (SORENTO)
Rochester, Minn.,
Jacksonville, Fla.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of CAM2029 to octreotide LAR or lanreotide ATG in patients with advanced, well-differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic-Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NET). Patients who experience progressive disease in the randomized part of the study may proceed to an open-label extension part with intensified treatment with CAM2029.
-
Randomized, Double-Blinded Phase III Study of CABozantinib Versus Placebo IN Patients with Advanced NEuroendocrine Tumors After Progression on prior therapy (CABINET) (CABINET)
Rochester, Minn.,
Jacksonville, Fla.,
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.
The purpose of this study is to see how well cabozantinib S-malate works compared with placebo in treating patients with neuroendocrine tumors previously treated with everolimus that have spread to nearby tissues or lymph nodes, have spread to other places in the body, or cannot be removed by surgery. Cabozantinib S-malate is a chemotherapy drug known as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and it targets specific tyrosine kinase receptors, that when blocked, may slow tumor growth.
.